Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
The scholarly method you mention works only if one is intelligent enough to be able to identify contradictions between sources, and decide on the credibility of said sources. One must not just have the information, but understand the implications thereof.
The Imperial Battlemage, Lore Fanatic and Elder Scrolls Entrepeneur Extraordinaire, out.
Both the Elder Scrolls Wiki and UESP Wiki rely on OOG (Out of Game) content in their articles, which is uncanon (If you wish me to elaborate further on that, I will). They have incomplete and sometimes misleading articles.
However, they are accurate a lot of the time.
While it is true that anyone can edit them, both Wikis have dedicated patrollers that make sure edits are accurate. Other members of the community also police edits.
Furthermore, all information added to a lore article requires sourcing, which usually keeps false information out. Common knowledge and some of the incomplete articles are exceptions to this rule.
Yes, but the lazy way is also okay for video's. I just want to be sure I am telling the truth so I search for it myself. That is why I do not upload very much, making a video takes time and I mostly don't have that time haha