安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
i think the way you made the hardpoints is a bit unreliable, bc using the dual machineguns of the top slot use up a lot more resources than it should, the twin-vulcan on the base game costs 30 payload, while the basic bulcans cost 20p for 20mm, 10p/10a for 12.7 and 20p for 30mm. Personaly, i think the better hardpoint arrangement would to replace the left with the primary hardpoints, so you can have any machinegun on the left slot, and micro-missiles/rockets on the outer-point, leaving bottom to be used as bombs and right for special weapons, such as longbows and javelins or pursuit missiles
F-15 strike eagle
F-35
or MiG 29 fulcrum please