Pagina din magazin
Cities: Skylines
Toate Discuții Capturi de ecran Ilustrații Difuzări Videoclipuri Atelier Știri Ghiduri Recenzii

Cities: Skylines

Pagina din magazin
Cities: Skylines >  Atelier > Atelierul lui ehrlund
111 evaluări
Forsmark reactor nr: 3
Descriere Discuții0 Comentarii7 Notițe privind schimbările
   
Premiază
Adaugă la preferate
Preferat
Elimină din preferate
Assets: Building, Electricity
Dimensiunea fișierului
Postat
11.000 MB
19 dec. 2015 la 16:17
1 notiță privind schimbările ( vizionare )
Creat de
ehrlund
Offline
Afișează cele 1019 colecții (unele pot fi ascunse)
12,661 Vizitatori unici
5,880 Abonați actuali
352 Preferate

Abonează-te pentru a descărca
Forsmark reactor nr: 3

Descriere
Forsmark3.1 by ehrlund:

This is the last nuclear power reactor of a total of three, representing Forsmarks all reactors in Sweden.

(The 3.1 is just because of a minor tweak.)

Because CS keeps crashing when I try to open the model in the asset editor to find out the data, this is this the only info about the building I got at the moment:

Plot Sizes: Reactor 1 & 2: 12x13 Reactor 3: 8x16 I think, gotta check this one up to...


Up Keep: 300 / week
Power Out put: 900 MW

This being the latest and most efficient reactor of the three.

I think reactor 1 and 2 have basically the same specks as the in game Power Plant. You should obviously build them in the correct order as well. Reactor 1, Reactor 2 and last Reactor 3 :)

Reactor: 1
http://steamproxy.net/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=579355760
Reactor: 2
http://steamproxy.net/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=579350450
7 comentarii
< >
YOYO 14 sept. 2022 la 2:12 
The asset is beautiful, but why can't the fence be removed? Because of the fence, it is difficult to make the overall shape and layout. Too many fence makes the power plant ugly. Hope the author updates the asset so that the fence can be removed.
simson 14 iul. 2020 la 1:39 
I was looking for a Barsebäck for a nice Øresund area but this is a good substitute.
Phillipzu 19 iul. 2019 la 8:51 
Fits well in the Soviet NPP collection:
https://steamproxy.net/workshop/filedetails/?id=1808642059
Keep up the good work! :D
norlin.martin 4 iul. 2016 la 15:18 
I uesd to live near that thing. Thanks!
Casgar 24 dec. 2015 la 10:55 
Just some suggestions, I think you should increase the weekly cost by quite abit. 300-500/week sound way too low imo. A x20 increase in the weekly cost would still be relatively cheep cost per MW.

Regarding the power output, have you chosen the numbers based on anything special? The actual outputs from the real reactors varies somewhere around 1000-1200 MW each, with Reactor 1 being the "smallest" as of right now.
Captain-No 19 dec. 2015 la 17:54 
fit well in the -Scandinavian- all in one Collection:
http://steamproxy.net/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=513137131
thank you, Thumbs up
Blackdragonbird 19 dec. 2015 la 17:09 
Can you please give more data? Each piece power output, water consumption, upkeep, build costs, plot size. And them the stats of the whole strutucture put togheter.

You can also create a collection with the 3 pieces to make easy to subscribe to all of them at once.

=)