安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
Those are REALLY good ideas!
Israel could start with no settlers, but a stronger military made OP by the unique trait (which would only last temporarily), as Israel conquered its cities, they did not settle them.
Another name for the trait could be "Promised Land".
And there seems to be a bug: I was not able to spread religion with the Ark of the Covenant. Neither own cities nor cities of the enemy (neither durig war nor in peace). And think about more movement in neutral or own area. The next is - I use it nearly only as citadel. So for me is the general better. Set the citadel next to a city - the stationed unit always gets damaged.
maybe I see it too negative - will try it. UB und UU - good ideas
(I often wished that more than more worker can work on one hex - this would be an alternative.)
Free worker with new city exists already - nearly (with built monumet replacement you get one - Armenian Empire). So I like this idea more.
UA - I fully agree. A disadvantage as UA - what's this???