Cài đặt Steam
đăng nhập
|
ngôn ngữ
简体中文 (Hán giản thể)
繁體中文 (Hán phồn thể)
日本語 (Nhật)
한국어 (Hàn Quốc)
ไทย (Thái)
Български (Bungari)
Čeština (CH Séc)
Dansk (Đan Mạch)
Deutsch (Đức)
English (Anh)
Español - España (Tây Ban Nha - TBN)
Español - Latinoamérica (Tây Ban Nha cho Mỹ Latin)
Ελληνικά (Hy Lạp)
Français (Pháp)
Italiano (Ý)
Bahasa Indonesia (tiếng Indonesia)
Magyar (Hungary)
Nederlands (Hà Lan)
Norsk (Na Uy)
Polski (Ba Lan)
Português (Tiếng Bồ Đào Nha - BĐN)
Português - Brasil (Bồ Đào Nha - Brazil)
Română (Rumani)
Русский (Nga)
Suomi (Phần Lan)
Svenska (Thụy Điển)
Türkçe (Thổ Nhĩ Kỳ)
Українська (Ukraine)
Báo cáo lỗi dịch thuật
6.4 - 6.5 ghz ? 5.4 ghz ring clock ?
Rig 1 DDR5 = 146 FPS
- 14900k @ 6.2 ghz ht off e cores off
- Asus Apec encore bios 0080
- Team group DDR 5 @ 8,400 cl -c36 tuned
- Strix 4090
- Asus pg27aqn 1440p 360 hz ulmb 2
Rig 2 DDR4 = 143 FPS
- 13900 ks @ 6.2 ghz / 52 ring / ht off / e cores off
- Asus Strix wifi d4 bios 1801
- G.skill 32gb dual rank 4,400 c17 @ 4,300 cl 15 Gear 1
- Strix 3080 12gb
- 1080p 240hz aoc
yaab standard settings / malloc used tbbmalloc_202150 / large pages enabled both tests on both rigs
LINKS showing timings and scores and speeds
ddr5 rig score link https://ibb.co/0JWDLBD
ddr4 rig score link https://ibb.co/gPNHDbV
But I think I would rather wait for the 16900k
Main Rig
binned 14th gen 14900 k - SP 115 / MC-87
APEX Z-790 ENCORE BIOS 0071
6.0 ghz all P cores @ 1.42V
5.1 ghz Ring cache
4.6 ghz E cores
TEAM Group 48 GB - DDR 5 @ 8,400 mhz c36 tuned - 232,000 trfc
Strix Rtx 4090
gen 4 m.2
Key press S start of test 1080p
149 FPS average
64GB Ram
RTX 3070
Bloom Off
Motion Blur Off
Very High Settings
YAAB Standard applied
Low 22
High 48
Average 32.6
I have no idea why it's so low. Even on fresh load I get texture popin for a second before it's fine for second/third tests. I tried doing some of those other options mentioned in other comments and I still can't even touch 60 FPS at all even at the start when dumping quality hyper low.
I'm stumped. I think This might be the lowest mark mentioned here