Installer Steam
Logg inn
|
språk
简体中文 (forenklet kinesisk)
繁體中文 (tradisjonell kinesisk)
日本語 (japansk)
한국어 (koreansk)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bulgarsk)
Čeština (tsjekkisk)
Dansk (dansk)
Deutsch (tysk)
English (engelsk)
Español – España (spansk – Spania)
Español – Latinoamérica (spansk – Latin-Amerika)
Ελληνικά (gresk)
Français (fransk)
Italiano (italiensk)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesisk)
Magyar (ungarsk)
Nederlands (nederlandsk)
Polski (polsk)
Português (portugisisk – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisisk – Brasil)
Română (rumensk)
Русский (russisk)
Suomi (finsk)
Svenska (svensk)
Türkçe (tyrkisk)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamesisk)
Українська (ukrainsk)
Rapporter et problem med oversettelse
6.4 - 6.5 ghz ? 5.4 ghz ring clock ?
Rig 1 DDR5 = 146 FPS
- 14900k @ 6.2 ghz ht off e cores off
- Asus Apec encore bios 0080
- Team group DDR 5 @ 8,400 cl -c36 tuned
- Strix 4090
- Asus pg27aqn 1440p 360 hz ulmb 2
Rig 2 DDR4 = 143 FPS
- 13900 ks @ 6.2 ghz / 52 ring / ht off / e cores off
- Asus Strix wifi d4 bios 1801
- G.skill 32gb dual rank 4,400 c17 @ 4,300 cl 15 Gear 1
- Strix 3080 12gb
- 1080p 240hz aoc
yaab standard settings / malloc used tbbmalloc_202150 / large pages enabled both tests on both rigs
LINKS showing timings and scores and speeds
ddr5 rig score link https://ibb.co/0JWDLBD
ddr4 rig score link https://ibb.co/gPNHDbV
But I think I would rather wait for the 16900k
Main Rig
binned 14th gen 14900 k - SP 115 / MC-87
APEX Z-790 ENCORE BIOS 0071
6.0 ghz all P cores @ 1.42V
5.1 ghz Ring cache
4.6 ghz E cores
TEAM Group 48 GB - DDR 5 @ 8,400 mhz c36 tuned - 232,000 trfc
Strix Rtx 4090
gen 4 m.2
Key press S start of test 1080p
149 FPS average
64GB Ram
RTX 3070
Bloom Off
Motion Blur Off
Very High Settings
YAAB Standard applied
Low 22
High 48
Average 32.6
I have no idea why it's so low. Even on fresh load I get texture popin for a second before it's fine for second/third tests. I tried doing some of those other options mentioned in other comments and I still can't even touch 60 FPS at all even at the start when dumping quality hyper low.
I'm stumped. I think This might be the lowest mark mentioned here