Arma 3
442 Bewertungen
Yet Another Arma Benchmark
3
3
2
   
Preis verleihen
Favorisieren
Favorisiert
Entfernen
Data Type: Scenario
Scenario Gameplay: Singleplayer
Scenario Map: Altis, OtherMap
Meta: Dependency
Dateigröße
Veröffentlicht
Aktualisiert
645.440 KB
14. Jan. 2015 um 11:37
11. März 2021 um 20:15
25 Änderungshinweise (anzeigen)

Abonnieren zum Herunterladen
Yet Another Arma Benchmark

Beschreibung
About 2 minutes long scripted intro for measuring your average FPS. Emphasis on AI fighting performance, bullets, and explosions.

The mission is CPU heavy; below 60 fps results are likely even on a high-end PCs.

You can save up to 20 results. Useful for comparing performance between different game versions, system setups, game tweaks and mods.
Select multiple results with ctrl+mouse click to view their average score.

PLEASE NOTE: this isn't an exact scientific benchmark because of the AI. It's inherently random, so every run is always a bit different. Expect about ±2 fps variance between runs. So if you intend to compare effects of some minor system/settings tweaks, they probably won't be visible with YAAB.

Latest version: YAAB v1.02 (Mar 11th 2021)
- minor UI tweaks and improved consistency
Beliebte Diskussionen Alle anzeigen (3)
21
26. Nov. 2023 um 9:51
Share your benchmakrs
[TPPL] King Leonidas
4
18. Juli 2016 um 21:17
What would be the correct settings to test this Benchmark
YME
3
24. Juli 2016 um 21:06
Where is the result saved?
Biggus Diggus
330 Kommentare
Vulpecula 6. Aug. um 23:07 
@Toby_283 definitely 7800x3d. The performance would be similar. My 7800x3d can get above 135 fps which around what you'll get with 14700 but it does this while staying cooler, using less energy and more importantly, staying stable. Intel 13 and 14th gen CPUs are failing en Masse right now and it looks like a big deal.
Toby_283 31. Juli um 17:44 
hey guys Ill be building myself a new PC (mostly for arma 3) and I need help with the cpu. Im curently deciding between the i7 14700 and the ryzen 7 7800x3d. As I said its mostly for arma and I just cant find any info anywhere alse about the performance in arma. Thx for help.
Bass Junkie 16. Juli um 23:41 
Mr Gramm what cpu speed and ring cahce speed ?

6.4 - 6.5 ghz ? 5.4 ghz ring clock ?
Bass Junkie 24. Dez. 2023 um 22:01 
merry christmas all i broke my record im on 2 pcs

Rig 1 DDR5 = 146 FPS

- 14900k @ 6.2 ghz ht off e cores off
- Asus Apec encore bios 0080
- Team group DDR 5 @ 8,400 cl -c36 tuned
- Strix 4090
- Asus pg27aqn 1440p 360 hz ulmb 2

Rig 2 DDR4 = 143 FPS

- 13900 ks @ 6.2 ghz / 52 ring / ht off / e cores off
- Asus Strix wifi d4 bios 1801
- G.skill 32gb dual rank 4,400 c17 @ 4,300 cl 15 Gear 1
- Strix 3080 12gb
- 1080p 240hz aoc

yaab standard settings / malloc used tbbmalloc_202150 / large pages enabled both tests on both rigs

LINKS showing timings and scores and speeds

ddr5 rig score link https://ibb.co/0JWDLBD

ddr4 rig score link https://ibb.co/gPNHDbV
Bass Junkie 7. Dez. 2023 um 3:48 
sperg it would be so close you could oc to 5.5 - 5.8 ghz p cores easy maybe less ram speed vs 14900k since imc prob worse but nothing you would notice
Sperg 4. Dez. 2023 um 6:28 
@Bass Junkie I'm also quite curious to see what a i5 14600k would do, maybe someone will have the time to test one
Sperg 4. Dez. 2023 um 6:23 
@Bass Junkie Damn dude, that;s pretty insane... 14900k seems to be the way to go so far.
But I think I would rather wait for the 16900k :steamhappy:
Bass Junkie 2. Dez. 2023 um 3:42 
Update on my new Rig had a 13th gen binned 13900 ks SP-120 @ 6.0 ghz and DDR 4 32 GB @ 4,300 CL 15 Gear1 tuned , rtx 4090 tha tscored 130.2 fps average best run this is 2nd pc now

Main Rig
binned 14th gen 14900 k - SP 115 / MC-87
APEX Z-790 ENCORE BIOS 0071
6.0 ghz all P cores @ 1.42V
5.1 ghz Ring cache
4.6 ghz E cores
TEAM Group 48 GB - DDR 5 @ 8,400 mhz c36 tuned - 232,000 trfc
Strix Rtx 4090
gen 4 m.2

Key press S start of test 1080p

149 FPS average
RElentless 22. Nov. 2023 um 9:51 
i7-7700k
64GB Ram
RTX 3070
Bloom Off
Motion Blur Off
Very High Settings
YAAB Standard applied

Low 22
High 48
Average 32.6

I have no idea why it's so low. Even on fresh load I get texture popin for a second before it's fine for second/third tests. I tried doing some of those other options mentioned in other comments and I still can't even touch 60 FPS at all even at the start when dumping quality hyper low.
I'm stumped. I think This might be the lowest mark mentioned here