安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
Honestly, the naming conventions here are primarily for military stuff, so if you're doing something else yeah it'll be different.
Keep in mind that that different nations use different classification systems. So customizing yours as fits your needs makes perfect sense.
The ship types break into different types of modified ship from 1 single ship that is based on mining ship that is capable of spaceflight and atmosphere flight.
Also, the fleet type I am doing is industry based, not military, not sure if this changes anything.
The armed variations of the ship is lightly armed for self defence rather than for offensive objectives. Not sure if that changes anything.
The ship types I got:
Ship type 1:
Cockpit, Remote Control, Unarmed.
US-01
Ship type 2:
Cockpit, Remote Control, Armed.
QUS-01A
Ship Type 3:
Cockpit, Remote Control, Unarmed.
(Instead of 3x3 connector it will have 1x1 connector when update releases)
US-01B
Ship Type 4:
Cockpit, Remote Control, Armed.
QUS-01C
Also why some games use Mk1, Mk2 etc, is that realistic or nah?
Would I add Q to ship type 1 even if it has remote control, it was not modified, but instead it comes with it.
Apologies if it gets you on a wild goose research chase, I figured you already know this, but if not, let me know so then I can do my own research instead of you wasting your time.
Just fascinated by this naming / classification system that is based on real world.
BRUH 1000 character limit.
So there aren't multiple meanings of M or G for any given ship.