Steam'i Yükleyin
giriş
|
dil
简体中文 (Basitleştirilmiş Çince)
繁體中文 (Geleneksel Çince)
日本語 (Japonca)
한국어 (Korece)
ไทย (Tayca)
Български (Bulgarca)
Čeština (Çekçe)
Dansk (Danca)
Deutsch (Almanca)
English (İngilizce)
Español - España (İspanyolca - İspanya)
Español - Latinoamérica (İspanyolca - Latin Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Yunanca)
Français (Fransızca)
Italiano (İtalyanca)
Bahasa Indonesia (Endonezce)
Magyar (Macarca)
Nederlands (Hollandaca)
Norsk (Norveççe)
Polski (Lehçe)
Português (Portekizce - Portekiz)
Português - Brasil (Portekizce - Brezilya)
Română (Rumence)
Русский (Rusça)
Suomi (Fince)
Svenska (İsveççe)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamca)
Українська (Ukraynaca)
Bir çeviri sorunu bildirin
I'm glad you found it helpful.
A review is, after all, the fact paired with your opinion on it.
I will admit, that you also wrote this part, but it feels like more of an afterthought here.
Another point I often wonder about myself is the "you have to play through the game" - if after 2h you can tell, that the game is shit and you have some actual points for it, then why would you waste another 8h or so, before the game maybe gets better - that's on the game to be good from start to finish.
Then again, sometimes the game may just be bad because you played it "wrong", which begs the question "should it have explained itself better?".
I still haven't found a real answer for myself :D