Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
I'm glad you found it helpful.
A review is, after all, the fact paired with your opinion on it.
I will admit, that you also wrote this part, but it feels like more of an afterthought here.
Another point I often wonder about myself is the "you have to play through the game" - if after 2h you can tell, that the game is shit and you have some actual points for it, then why would you waste another 8h or so, before the game maybe gets better - that's on the game to be good from start to finish.
Then again, sometimes the game may just be bad because you played it "wrong", which begs the question "should it have explained itself better?".
I still haven't found a real answer for myself :D