Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem
I'm glad you found it helpful.
A review is, after all, the fact paired with your opinion on it.
I will admit, that you also wrote this part, but it feels like more of an afterthought here.
Another point I often wonder about myself is the "you have to play through the game" - if after 2h you can tell, that the game is shit and you have some actual points for it, then why would you waste another 8h or so, before the game maybe gets better - that's on the game to be good from start to finish.
Then again, sometimes the game may just be bad because you played it "wrong", which begs the question "should it have explained itself better?".
I still haven't found a real answer for myself :D