安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
Yes, each gearbox, clutch and number of propeller blades reduces efficiency a bit. But that doesn't mean an engine without any gearbox would produce higher thrust than engine with gearbox. If the load (which is determined by propeller type, blade count, collective value of the blades...etc) is small enough to allow the engine RPM hits RPM limit, then this means that you don't use the engine at full capacity. An extreme example of this would be using the large diesel engine with a single small propeller without having any gearbox.
1 quick question, why is there 2 gear boxes between the engine and the props/generator, that reduces efficiency right? shouldn't we remove the extra gearbox?
love from Argentina
Sure, I think it needs more engine power because of extra mass and that can be achieved by increasing RPS.
@Berntsen,
Thanks