安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Will remove at Cozar's request.
I really want to use this mod. It only makes sense that drinks and raw foods should not incur a debuff to eat without a table. (Lots of people enjoy things like drinks and stuff like berries on the go - e.g., while on a trail, jogging, on a road trip, etc.) I also like the novel approach of how the mood penalty is removed by changing the search radius and then using Harmony patches.
I assume Pemmican was nerfed because they no longer need a table, while Survival meals do. Instead, I'd suggest making Survival meals also edible without a table.
Whenever I think of Packaged survival meals, I think of MRE's. Those are truly "Meal Ready to Eat"; They're pre-cooked, making them safe to eat straight from the package - warm or cold. They can be eaten out of the wrappers with the plastic utensils provided. These are often eaten on a campout, on-the-go, or in an emergency. So, if survival meals are anything like MRE's, I'd say the consumer would not need a table.
But I also sincerely appreciate the performance boost! Noticeable!
Hot dogs I would make tableless, but sausages I didn't because I think of them more like a bratwurst plate.
What's your guideline and method on choosing if a food should count? In my head, cheeses and sausage shouldn't require a table, and a simple xpath on my end could account for that. Seriously excellent work with your mods!