Instalează Steam
conectare
|
limbă
简体中文 (chineză simplificată)
繁體中文 (chineză tradițională)
日本語 (japoneză)
한국어 (coreeană)
ไทย (thailandeză)
български (bulgară)
Čeština (cehă)
Dansk (daneză)
Deutsch (germană)
English (engleză)
Español - España (spaniolă - Spania)
Español - Latinoamérica (spaniolă - America Latină)
Ελληνικά (greacă)
Français (franceză)
Italiano (italiană)
Bahasa Indonesia (indoneziană)
Magyar (maghiară)
Nederlands (neerlandeză)
Norsk (norvegiană)
Polski (poloneză)
Português (portugheză - Portugalia)
Português - Brasil (portugheză - Brazilia)
Русский (rusă)
Suomi (finlandeză)
Svenska (suedeză)
Türkçe (turcă)
Tiếng Việt (vietnameză)
Українська (ucraineană)
Raportează o problemă de traducere
Please fix this, we really want to use it in our playthrough since it is a great concept, just horribly broken right now.
All 3 of us are now pretty sure having a cap on Menace is a major factor in this problem.
The epitome of WTFery was 2 people at cap Menace, and one of them somehow passing the other Highest Menace by attacking an enemy... I don't even ;3
You might also want to use the in game adjustments offered by LeaderLib, for the Menace system- Set an attribute to decrease Menace, increase decay rates ETC.
It is my understanding that DarkAssassiaN is considering several ways to approach the issue.
Wits because for example in my head it's like... Thinking tactically, not presenting your self as a target to the enemy ETC ETC in a role play sense. It's your "Smarts" but not your intelligence or wisdom let's say. So you'd not be attracting too much attention, striking surgically and methodically - It is even supported by how Wits do increase Crit.
And of course Sneaking because it means you know how to be... Sneaky. IE, not attract attention, be stealthy ETC.