Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
But in your instances all of these merchants had to clim up the political ladder to get away with what thay did.
Historically it's rare that any one single merchant had sway over nations to be able to declare war, but claiming that no business historically has attempted to kill another business leader is a bit silly. Patricians in the Hanseatic League were at each other's throats constantly, funding privateers to rob rival merchants, and they competed with merchants from Mediterrean too.
I don't know, just saying that no merchant in the history of ever never did anything underhanded to another is a lie.
If an opposing merchant convoy has a majority of it's interests invested into that certain trade, hiring assassins, or thugs to take those goods is perfectly logical. Obviously you can't do this ingame but leading a group of troops and destroying them? Totally fine.
Slave traders, the people that raided, beat people up and sold them off, were also merchants.