Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
guals brattina germanii
present day they were 1 of the strongest factions i mean they have mafia its the really orginazed gang and they got a pope so when people say rome was made too rule the world i think they should of have but i would not give them too much khowlage cuz they might be bad
also his family was the house of jullia he said I came I saw I conquered
I think it would be cool if they explored some different scenarios as well. Ghengis Khan maybe? Three Kingdoms of Korea (lessor known time period), or Three Kingdoms of China (more well known, such as the Novel Romance of the Three Kingdoms and the game of the same name by Koei).
but just commenting on rehashing though, I felt Medieval II was superior to Rome, and I know I will be in the minority on this, but actually Empire was superior to both of them in terms of scope, which surprises even me because initially that game made me swear off C.A. games in.
In terms of mechanics though, with each release the mechanics get better and better, Including Rome II.