安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Thank you very much for your comment and advice :)
Yes, I agree that with “dirty” textures, buildings will look more realistic. And sometimes I try to add scuffed and traces of water on the walls. And I do not always rationally use the space conceived for the size of the texture. Because I do not want to make the size of the texture 2048x2048px for small buildings, and the texture 512x512 can not fit the details of scuffs and dirt with a normal scan model.
Also, I always try to make the asset less "heavy", but it does not always obtained. Especially it concerns the number of triangles of the LOD model.
Nevertheless, I will try to make my subsequent buildings more realistic, but this hardly applies to new buildings from New Zealand, since they are already ready above 50%
Thank you very much for subscribing to my workshop.
A bit of criticism: I think that some of your buildings look too clean and flat. They would probably benefit from a better normal and specular maps, as well as some grunge, water damage, cracks on the textures... just scroll through textures.com to see what I mean: https://www.textures.com/search?q=house