Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
Thank you very much for your comment and advice :)
Yes, I agree that with “dirty” textures, buildings will look more realistic. And sometimes I try to add scuffed and traces of water on the walls. And I do not always rationally use the space conceived for the size of the texture. Because I do not want to make the size of the texture 2048x2048px for small buildings, and the texture 512x512 can not fit the details of scuffs and dirt with a normal scan model.
Also, I always try to make the asset less "heavy", but it does not always obtained. Especially it concerns the number of triangles of the LOD model.
Nevertheless, I will try to make my subsequent buildings more realistic, but this hardly applies to new buildings from New Zealand, since they are already ready above 50%
Thank you very much for subscribing to my workshop.
A bit of criticism: I think that some of your buildings look too clean and flat. They would probably benefit from a better normal and specular maps, as well as some grunge, water damage, cracks on the textures... just scroll through textures.com to see what I mean: https://www.textures.com/search?q=house