Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
Thank you very much for your comment and advice :)
Yes, I agree that with “dirty” textures, buildings will look more realistic. And sometimes I try to add scuffed and traces of water on the walls. And I do not always rationally use the space conceived for the size of the texture. Because I do not want to make the size of the texture 2048x2048px for small buildings, and the texture 512x512 can not fit the details of scuffs and dirt with a normal scan model.
Also, I always try to make the asset less "heavy", but it does not always obtained. Especially it concerns the number of triangles of the LOD model.
Nevertheless, I will try to make my subsequent buildings more realistic, but this hardly applies to new buildings from New Zealand, since they are already ready above 50%
Thank you very much for subscribing to my workshop.
A bit of criticism: I think that some of your buildings look too clean and flat. They would probably benefit from a better normal and specular maps, as well as some grunge, water damage, cracks on the textures... just scroll through textures.com to see what I mean: https://www.textures.com/search?q=house