Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
and before some people start shit, red hook doesn't mind it as long as you aren't giving away core dlc features (i.e. districts or the courtyard itself) as part of the mod.
Honestly, it's fine, adding multiple bleed checks seems to create its own problems in-game anyway, might as well just stick with the one I provided. And try to figure out if it's balanced from the stats I gave it. Then I can finally bring this mod to version 1 officially.
Again I don't see the issue with having a comp that reduces bleed resist as if they reduce resist far enough then yes the bleed will do 100% dmg 100% of the time, but that has always been true even of traditional bleeds. The expected value stays the same.
I'm not trying to tell you what to do, or even really suggesting you should do this at this point. I just find it interesting as I have myself recently been exploring atypical skill design and this mod piqued my interest as a clever take on an old skill.
My thinking with the individual 1 point bleeds would be to have them all have the same much lower % chance and let a random number of them succeed or fail to essentially achieve the same effect.
For example 6 100% chances vs 50% resist;
6 damage - 1/62
5 damage - 6/62
4 damage - 15/62
3 damage - 18/62
2 damage - 15/62
1 damage - 6/62
0 damage - 1/62
A more normal 6 dmg bleed at 100% vs 50% resist'
6 damage - 1/2 (31/62)
0 damage - 1/2 (31/62)