bro played in easy difficulty

Anytime someone replies to a review with a mod to make the game better they prove the reviews point

@Vicxent

Its just called bad game design, sure you can play bad on purpose but thats just overall not fun if the game isn't designed well, to call this in any way realistic is just plain silly to me. I mean heck from what im reading there are no persistent bodies or craters or any of those important details, what a bad game once more from another team of incompetent devs that dont know what defines their genre.

And to everyone else: How does giving enemies simply higher stats fix these issues created by the lack of mechanics? Its the games job to make you want to play the game and not autoresolve by default while letting you autoresolve obvious victories.

This boils down to Play-style VS META. Yes auto battle is better and attacking weaker tiles will most probably be a win on your favor.

That's why I intentionally play as a WW1 general and keep sending soldiers to Ypres and Verdun to their deaths, even though there are areas that are weaker and would be an easy victory. It does lack depth and immersion as well as persistence in some area, but with what we have available this is the realistic~ish WW1 simcade in the market rn.

ok install this mod and try to win

https://steamproxy.net/app/2109370/discussions/0/3820784854038213976/

Change the difficulty all you want, the game quickly gets boring and repetitive and you're going to squeeze in a max of 100 hours before you realize that you're better off buying something from the Total War franchise.

have you tried I dunno

A: Raising the difficulty
or
B: try to engage the game by actually playing the battles
or
C: Both?

ok now try to rise the difficulty