12
Products
reviewed
2192
Products
in account

Recent reviews by skyler.

< 1  2 >
Showing 1-10 of 12 entries
1 person found this review helpful
14.2 hrs on record (4.4 hrs at review time)
This game is to 99% awesome, challenging and I'm having a blast whenever I play it.
Why not 100% you might ask? Well.. there are two main critique points I have:

1. Who needs ammunition?
I played nearly every Doom part (1 - 4) and never had a real problem with any of my guns having not enough ammo. Sure, you are getting used to it - early on you get a tool to get ammo from nearly any demon - if it has ammo of course - but it often ruins my flow of rip n' tearing as it forces me to switch weapons. For example, I'm currently in an arena, just wanted to use my wonderful shotgun but HOLD ON, nonono, I’m forced to use my heavy machine gun. However, this happens rarely and to some extent I understand this design choice. Otherwise, it would be to Doom 2016?

2. The story
Okay, hear me out. I'm not even close before done with the game. However, I already started reading the wiki because the second I started playing, I got confused. (Spoiler for ending of Doom 2016 & beginning of the game following) How the ♥♥♥♥ did Doom guy who got sent to hell at the end of Doom 2016 with no sign of ever returning come to this fortress? It feels like he snapped twice and now he's back! I mean, yeah, we need some action, but couldn't Id find a better way to connect both games? UPDATE: I'm now at 2/3 of the game and there is a cutscene explaining how he came there. I can understand the design choice but I think a cutscene or short introduction sentence would have helped out a lot.

Regardless, I like the overall story, cutscenes are a little annoying as I just want to kill more demons but are fine.

Overall, this may sound picky. As a Doom fan, I think I can be a little picky. If you're new to the franchise, BUY IT and as a returning player, you too but turn your brain off and rip n' tear those demons! Both of you won't regret it.
Posted 9 May, 2020. Last edited 18 June, 2020.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
1 person found this review helpful
0.1 hrs on record
the 7 minutes I played this blintiful game was the best time of my life.
Posted 13 June, 2019. Last edited 13 June, 2019.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
1 person found this review helpful
75.8 hrs on record (61.3 hrs at review time)
To make it short, Warframe is one if not the best example of F2P done right.
Why? It's not pay to win, there's ton of free content (including two open world areas, many weapons etc..) and it makes ton of fun with others/friends. I play the game since two years and enjoyed every minute of it. The game might get a little grindy but it is 100% F2P.

What makes the game even better is that the developers really care about the game and its community. They often do devstreams and others streams to build a strong bound to the community. And.. it works! I watched some of their streams and loved the way they showed new things. They even have their own convention "Tennocon". I hope I get the chance to go there.

This is why I nominated the game for "Labor of love".
There's no reason why you shouldn't play the game, so start it now!
Posted 22 November, 2018.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
No one has rated this review as helpful yet
8.8 hrs on record (6.8 hrs at review time)
You might wonder why you should buy a game in which you only save (T)Rump although you don't like him and think to yourself, "5$ that's too much".

But there's one reason why you should buy this game, you just have a good time while playing it. It felt rewarding every time I saved (T)rump while fighting against my strongest enemy, the controls and his friend, the bullet. I can't say why I have played it for so long, more than many "better" games with the same or lower price which are in my library.

Buy it for the meme, for the cards and the achievements, not for thinking which other game you could have bought for the $4.99 (0.99 on sale).
There is no reason why you shouldn't dive (T)Rump from the stage.
Posted 20 May, 2018. Last edited 20 May, 2018.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
1 person found this review helpful
1 person found this review funny
17.4 hrs on record (10.5 hrs at review time)
Please note, I only use informations which are provided in the description.

I nominated this game for the "Space (not) for beginners" award.
But seriously it's pretty hard, at the beginning you enjoy the wonderful soundtrack (which I got for free at my local electronics market, I <3 you bethesda and arkane studios) while you ask yourself, "hey what can go wrong?" shortly followed by "why are there so many monsters?!?!?!?!" and then "OMG RUN RUN, can't you run faster??"

I know, I know I played only 10 hours of the game but most likely I rage quit (yup, that's sometimes me) or I want to play something else.

So why is this space adventure nothing for beginners?

Ever heard about Talos 1? No?
Ok, let me start from the beginning.

Talos 1 is a space station orbiting the moon, we find ourself again in the year 2032. The space station is owned by a company called TranStar, which converted it to a hightech research and development station. We play as Morgan Yu or as Ms Yu. Our mission is ehm.. wait a minute.. survive. Why? Yeah, something "bigger" went wrong, but somehow we survived it and now we need to fix the problems, sounds easy right? Ok, lets shortly grab our stuff, wait I just found a wrench (your new best friend) hopefully it will help us someway...
Wait, what was this? Did the chair moved? *walking closer* OMG RUN RUN!!! WHAT IS THIS??
Apparently we forgot something, it isn't a small problem anymore, its an outbreak of scary monsters.

This is not a mimic.
Posted 23 November, 2017.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
1 person found this review helpful
4 people found this review funny
0.0 hrs on record
Its Dark Souls, there won't be a fourth part and you want more?


I bought the collection on pc and playstation/xbox,



\[T]/ \[T]/ \[T]/ \[T]/ \[T]/ \[T]/ \[T]/ \[T]/ \[T]/ \[T]/
Posted 8 October, 2017.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
34 people found this review helpful
2.9 hrs on record
Early Access Review
First I want to give you a small overview why so many people hate it and because I think this game can be good but why it isnt.
IMPORTANT: I use SteamDB and other sources which are in brackets for getting the informations for this review if anything isn't correct please write a comment down and I will correct the false statements.

On June 1st a game called Blood of Old (Note: Not this one!) launched on Steam which haven't got much attention until the game got the first time free on 12th of Dezember 2015 on a site called Indiegala. It was a Open World, RPG and Adventure game. Until this date the game had 37% Positive Reviews (IndieGameBundle). Myself and many others got the game for free on this date. Later, just one year ago it came a next time for free on gleam.io. The game got more attention but the jump to postive reviews wasn't there. After a long time on 18th of Feburary the Developer (and probably only) anounced that the game isn't dead and there will be a relaunch in 2-3 months.
And now on 20th of May this game launched and the other one disappeared from steam. The Developer created a studio called AWStudios which means that this will be a complete new chapter in Blood of Old and nothing will be bad anymore. But as you can see the game is in earliest (its an Prealpha) Access and it has negative reviews. I played it for a short while, idled the cards and deinstalled it. Yup it is in Early Access but it feels like playing a framework and not a game.

Why? Because IT IS A FRAMEWORK! IT ISNT A GAME! IT HAS ONE GOOD IDEA BUT THATS EVERYTHING GOOD!


So here's the promised update (early):
After reading some discussions on Steam I found some comments which say that "you get a key for it by voting for Blood of Old (old version) on Steam Greenlight (old program to bring indie games into Steam store)". It is of course against the steam rules but he refused everything (Steamgifts | SteamCommunity, AWStudios Group) and there are no screenshots so I am not 100% sure but I think the story is true.
Another thing why you shouldn't buy this game: He developed 2-3 years ago for another studio (his?) called "Decaying Earth Studios" who developed, Decaying Earth but it never got on Steam Greenlight or on the store. You can visit their twitter/facebook account to see some early pictures but yeah.. its unfinished. I don't think that this game will launch some day, but our best friend Andrew Watt probably found until then out that there is an easy way to get people get their game by just making no "AAA" games and selling keys (or gifting) them to people who give the game out for free so he can "promote" it so that more "real" people buy it. That's a shame because I don't like people trying to "steal" others money.

Thanks @Steam for deleting this game.
I hope that the story about voting for the game is true, hopefully we'll never hear about these sketchy methods to get people to buy the game.

Also btw thanks to the community, you were awesome :) (33 Likes and just one dislike)
Have a nice day :)
Posted 12 September, 2017. Last edited 11 November, 2017.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
24 people found this review helpful
3 people found this review funny
0.0 hrs on record
and the world again gets more wang.



thanks.
Posted 22 August, 2017.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
No one has rated this review as helpful yet
3.7 hrs on record (0.6 hrs at review time)
I really like it but I get graphics issues on 3440 x 1440 Resolution. I have a GTX 1080 and every other game works well.

But it is still a very good and funny game.
Posted 3 August, 2017.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
No one has rated this review as helpful yet
3.5 hrs on record (0.4 hrs at review time)
Ein sehr einfaches "Puzzle-Prinzip", man muss nur in der richtigen Zeit, die richtigen Tasten (Mausklick) am richtigen ort drücken, schon bekommt man 5+ Erfolge. Das Spiel besitzt keine Story, die Level unterscheiden sich in ihrem Schwierigkeitsgrad indem man sich entscheiden muss, welches der "Roten Blöcke" man zum explodieren bringt. Das Ziel ist es in jedem dieser Level eine Blaue Kugel in ein dunkel grünes Feld zu bringen.

Das Spiel ist empfehlenswert für Leute, die Erfolge für wenig Aufwand haben wollen. Dennoch sind die Level nicht sehr einfach, sodass man doch manchmal überlegen muss.


Als reines Puzzle Spiel nicht zu empfehlen, da es heutzutage solche Puzzle schon fast in jedem Spiel gibt.
6/10 ~> Empfehlenswert (aber nur für Leute, die mit der Anzahl ihrer Erfolge andere begeistern wollen oder einfach noch einen Euro üprig haben)
Posted 6 June, 2017. Last edited 6 June, 2017.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
< 1  2 >
Showing 1-10 of 12 entries