Install Steam
sign in
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem

It is not what the dog is doing, but why the dog is doing.
The dog does many things. The dog do sniff, the dog do bark. But it is the why that intertwines the fabricated concepts that we have built, such as consciousness, into another being. We can apply Descartes' "Cogito, ergo sum" or rather, "I think therefore I am," into this equation. Though, can we expand? Existentialism is not the boundaries for this, no, we need to ask if the dog aware. Solipsism is they key here, for if the dog is aware, then we must ask ourselves if we are aware? The dog is aware of their own actions and being, and thus, they are, as they are doing. What separates us, however, is that we are aware of the state of awareness. We acknowledge this never ending cycle of awareness and being aware to our state of being, and associate it with our existence, for without it we are mindless vessels that house Mother Nature's Intellect.