+rep

╔═══════════════════════════════════►
║Данная страница защищена!
║Данная печать защитит аккаунты от взлома и от тупых школьников
║Лицензия Steam Valve
║ ║▌│█│║▌║█║│║▌║
║ ║▌│█│║▌║█║│║▌║
║ ║▌│█│║▌║█║│║▌║
║
║
║© 1998-2018 Vаlve Corporation
║Все права защищены законом.
║
║ ║▌│█│║▌║█║│║▌║
║ ║▌│█│║▌║█║│║▌║
║ ║▌│█│║▌║█║│║▌║
╚═══════════════════════════════════►

░░█░░░█▀█░█▀▀░█▀█
▀▀█▀▀░█▀▄░█▀░░█▀▀
░░█░░░▀░▀░▀▀▀░▀░░
／ﾌﾌ 　　　　　　　ム｀ヽ
/ ノ) 　　　　　　　　）　ヽ
/ ｜　　( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°）ノ⌒（ゝ._,ノ
/　ﾉ⌒7⌒ヽーく　 ＼　／
丶＿ ノ ｡　　 ノ､　｡|/
　　 `ヽ `ー-'_人`ーﾉ
　　　 丶 ￣ _人'彡ﾉ

📘🎁📗🏓💎🚙🌸⚡🚙⚡👔💃🎁🏓🎍
🍧🐛📣🏀🌏🚕💙🕺🌂📒🐟💄🔋🎄🌽
"The argument that the literal story of Genesis can qualify as science
collapses on three major grounds: the creationists' need to invoke
miracles in order to compress the events of the earth's history into
the biblical span of a few thousand years; their unwillingness to
abandon claims clearly disproved,
including the assertion that all
fossils are products of Noah's flood; and their reliance upon distortion,
misquote, half-quote, and citation out of context to characterize the
ideas of their opponents."
-- Stephen Jay Gould, "The Verdict on Creationism",
The Skeptical Inquirer, Winter 87/88, pg. 186
📕🍆🎽🐝⛳🚗👳🍖🚘🌳👽🎈🥞🎫💎
👑🥗💗💚💛👹📘👃👾🐠🥒🐊📀🌸🐳

+rep отлично играешь бро)

added you for trade bro