27
已評論
產品
356
帳戶內
產品

Gordon 最近的評論

< 1  2  3 >
目前顯示第 11-20 項,共 27 項
1 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 24.5 小時 (評論時已進行 7.2 小時)
搶先體驗版評論
Deathgarden is a game similar to Behaviour Digital's other title, Dead by Daylight, in which 1 person is the hunter, and 5 others are the runners who need to either control points around the map or bring keys to points. What's interesting about this games design concept is that you move in a way that actually makes you feel as fast as the runner, and actually makes you feel like a hunter as the hunter. However, if 3 teammates are killed, the entire team loses the game. Runners are given the option of 3 different classes, and a bow and arrow to mark things, other runners, or the hunter, with using class abilities to do things like stun the hunter. On the other hand, hunters are able to do things like place turrets, use a shotgun or Automatic Rifle, and run at speeds faster than the runners. Now knowing the core of the game, are you ready for a jaw-dropping, lip clenching review? Well, I hope not, you'll be sadly disappointed. Let's just continue.

-- Graphics --
Score: 8/10 (Very good)
The graphics of this game are very good, but I don't think they're great, nor the best graphics I've seen. Nothing is in a 4k like quality, and its the type of graphics you'd probably see on a high-quality indie game. However, with a 1050TI GPU, it didn't cause any performance issue. Overall, I'd say that I don't think you, or others would be more impressed with the graphics then at most that score.

-- Gameplay --
Score: 7/10 (Good)
As said in the description of the game (at the beginning of this review), if 3 teammates are killed, your entire team losses. So due to this, your basically forced to work with your team, some of which may not communicate with you, others may try to troll. However, I think they kind of counter this with runners being able to do things like mark items and points, and cause some effect on the hunter like stun (unless they have that dumb stun nullifier, basically making the class useless at that point).

-- Sound & Music --
Score: 8/10 (Very good)
Deathgardens sound fits well with its environment, especially since the environments change every match.

-- Patched/Updates (with rates of them) --
Score: 4/10 (Bad)
Before I continue with this section, I wanted to note that the issue isn't with bug fixes, nor the rate of the updates. But the reason why this is at a low score is that Behaviour Digital has proven to do pretty bad with balancing any of their games, and this affects their games pretty badly.
For Deathgarden, again, during the time that they were doing a limited time free play, they had buffed the hunter to be way more OP then he was previously.

Overall: 8/10 (Very good)
Conclusion: Despite a bad score in patches/updates, I still think people should try this game as who knows they may actually like it. Its gameplay can be fun, and that's what matters more in this game than any of the other sections (unless it affects the gameplay of course).
張貼於 2018 年 10 月 5 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
6 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 2.2 小時
CAT Interstellar is an interesting story about... well that's not really clear actually. In fact, the little information you'd expect to be at least part of the background of the story is so limited, anything I include about the game's story could be considered spoilers. This isn't the only issue with the game as the animation is weak, and only contains 6 levels, all of which are too simple and way too short. Voice Acting is okay but doesn't feel like its done professionally, and it becomes cringey at times.

Aside from these cons, this game does have a few proofs such as good graphics, smooth controls, and the parts of the story that is told are fairly interesting. However the cons overlay the pros for this one, and its the reason why I can't recommend it, not at 5 dollars. Luckily I got this for 50 cents, and that's a price that I would recommend buying this game at, but no more as this game ultimately feels like a free to play game rather then a 5 dollar one.
張貼於 2018 年 4 月 25 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 90.3 小時 (評論時已進行 38.0 小時)
Subnautica is an amazing game that has exceptions for almost any type of gamer. This means as a casual gamer, or someone who loves survivals, or someone who loves horror, or if you just see something incredibly unique, this is just one of those gems. However I do have to warn people of its greatest con, and that is the games bugs. Although they say it been fully released during the entire time I have crashed multiple times, experienced terrain bugs, and overall just bugs that were meant to be taken care of in the development stages as when googling these issues, I have found that these are the same exact issues from almost a year ago. Maybe its because they forgot about this major issue, or said that they fixed it but in reality, they didn't. In fact, this would be the major issue that I would say to NOT recommend this game, however, I feel like this games aspects very slightly overthrow that major issue. Anyways if you don't want to take the big amount of peoples recommendation to get this game, I'd suggest checking out the many videos that YouTubers have already made to truly see if this game is right for you.

Again
Warning
This game is still buggy and susceptible to crashing and removing progress that you didn't save. Worst case scenario I'd suggest maybe waiting a few months before getting this game for them to patch that as that may cause you to go against the game like it almost had for me.
張貼於 2018 年 2 月 3 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
3 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 106.5 小時 (評論時已進行 23.9 小時)
搶先體驗版評論
Black Mesa is a game that tries to bring back our favorite, and most influential FPS game in the industry, and does it well. Nothing truly new is added in terms of overall plot-wise, but everything has been heavily updated to today's standards in graphics. This game is both enjoyable for both the new Half-life players and the old players who want to reconnect with their favorite scientist and badass. However, this does not mean that the game is perfect, and to be honest, its far from it. Besides from the extremely annoying year delay message (a third time as of writing) for the update that would add the actual final level (Half-life 1 players should know this level), I think its cons are explained well in some videos reviewing Black Mesa. Many of the points I wish to share, and agree on, is how some of the level design has been deterred causing for more "realism", and quite possibly less fun due to more restrictions per say. However this also doesn't mean to say that the game is bad (if for some reason people think that), or even just the level design is terrible, and it's far from it. It does have some amazing levels, possibly done better then what Half-life 1 did, but in some levels, you just have fewer options then you did when you played Half-life 1. Not to mention that the NPC mechanics come from Combine NPC mechanics from Half-life 2, which was a con with Half-Life 2.

Anyways, though I normally give a list of pros & cons as to why a game is or isn't recommended, I can't really think of many other cons that could make a true list that hasn't already been said in some of the reviews videos for this game. Some Half-life 1 players may be able to bring out some other points, but again this game is good, just not perfect. One thing above anything else is the fact that these developers for a while had been working for free, but since 2 years ago (at the time of writing) they just started the paid version. Even then they may not be getting enough money from this to spend their full time to work on the game alone (and there really isn't any reason to), and while some may think that could be considered an invalid argument because it is for some games, it isn't for this game.

Altogether, again a good game, just not perfect, and something I personally believe would be good for both for new Half-life players, and old ones.
張貼於 2018 年 1 月 13 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 0.4 小時
搶先體驗版評論
A pretty interesting game at first, but it really isn't a unique concept. What makes this game not worth getting, however, is the look of this meant to be an F2P. I don't like the fact that you pay for a game, and then there are microtransactions, similar to how EA messed up their Battlefront 2, and I'm pretty sure you (the reader of this review) wouldn't either. Other then that, I can't really come up with a detailed review of this game, so I'll just give a list of Pros and Cons.

Pros:
(-) Unique minion system where its a deck full of minions instead of a bit of a more limited system like some battling tower defense battling games

Cons:
(-) Micro Transactions
(-) Can get boring pretty fast
(-) Plays more like an F2P game instead of 5$ game
張貼於 2018 年 1 月 5 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
1 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 21.3 小時 (評論時已進行 19.7 小時)
Do you like unique history fighting games that also let you create and control armies? Are you one the people who like the Medieval ages, or History altogether? If you have any bit of interest in what I asked, I absolutely recommend this game. Since the moment I have gotten this game, I have been playing non-stop. Although there are a few issues, few would be from people (mainly kids) can't accept the graphics or the animations, I'm sure this game can be incredibly fun for you as well.

Pros:
(-) Unique gameplay compared to other battle simulator type games like Ultimate Epic Battle Simulator and Men of Assault Squad
(-) Has amazing mods such as the Star War Galaxy mod
(-) Pretty realistic in terms of battles
(-) Able to be run on just about any computer (although it can get a bit laggy if there are too many NPCs in a battle, that's kind of how most games are when there's a lot of entities.
(-) Multiplayer, at the time of writing, STILL has players playing this

Cons:
(For the kids who don't like these things) Graphics are from an older time
(For the kids who don't like these things) Animations are from an older time as well
(-) Can be a little buggy sometimes

There are some DLC that I do recommend getting, even though I strongly oppose DLC, luckily the DLC mainly adds just another game essentially, but it isn't required for anything. Other than that, if my list of pros and cons doesn't suggest that this is a great game, I'd suggest checking out gameplay as that was what kind of got me to get this game.
張貼於 2017 年 12 月 28 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
10 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
1 個人認為這篇評論很有趣
總時數 3.7 小時 (評論時已進行 2.4 小時)
This was my childhood game, and although I have this as not recommended, I do recommend this game if you have also experienced this game in your early days, and want to re-experience that. As for newcomers, unless you're 10 years old or younger, I don't recommend this game at all.

So why don't I recommend this game? Simple, it's incredibly repetitive. When in your first levels, you may enjoy the game, but then after I would say the fourth or fifth level, is when you will probably just get bored of the game and probably just stop playing the game ever again due to its heavy repeating. Not only that, but the game practically requires an auto clicker to stop from cramping your finger/hand after awhile on all levels. But other then all of that, if you do plan to get this game, I would say your best bet is to treat this like solitaire, or minefield, in terms of if you get really bored, and you don't really have any other game to play, it can probably help you out in that regard.
張貼於 2017 年 12 月 26 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
2 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
1 個人認為這篇評論很有趣
總時數 0.7 小時
This is an okay/good game for the people who are either creative or likes airplanes but doesn't know how to play flight simulator or both. Other than that, for people like me where I play GTA V, and Flight simulator, this game can get boring really quickly. So I have a list of pros and cons down below, and some extra notes at the end.

PROS:
(-) Has little to no limits in terms of building
(-) Seems to have at least some real-world physics
(-) Fun for people who just like sandbox games altogether

CONS:
(-) Graphics is nowhere near good
(-) Can get boring really quickly, even with the challenges
(-) No multiplayer (yes I know that there are mods so that you can play with friends, but I can only really find that)
(-) Airplanes seem to crash way too easily

So all I can really say is just don't get this game IF you are the type of person who plays even somewhat on Flight Simulator, or if you believe you're not that creative. I mean the list of pros and cons that I could think of kind of speak for themselves here. The game is limited by what it doesn't have, that it probably should. Anyways if you aren't that type of person, like I said, then go ahead and get this game.



張貼於 2017 年 12 月 26 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
3 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 20,676.1 小時 (評論時已進行 8,881.6 小時)
So its been 3 years and I still haven't made a review of this game. However, due to recent times, I feel like I need to ensure what the player can encounter, and what I think you should help the betterment of the game. I both do and don't recommend this game for many many reasons. For the past 3 years of playing Garry's Mod, I've experienced nothing but cancer, but fun at the same time. Garry's Mod for these past years, has gone down this hole where very few unique servers actually become successful and people obtain a mindset that each server is just a copy and paste, so whatever you can get on one server, might as well stay on there as it most likely isn't the same for other servers. Sure there are unique successful servers, but what I'm talking about are unique starting out servers. Servers in which people have spent money on as if they were spending money on a game project, expecting you to play, only to come with unfortunate fact that you need staff before you even can start a server, and that's the only thing you need. However that alone is incredibly difficult due to the interests of most players being really short. This has caused me unparamounted wasted money, time, and resources all because I had put faith and trust that these staff members would be doing what I had requested for them to do. None had arrived, and like I said, it wasted money, time, and resources. Why should this concern you if you buy this game? Well think of it like this, there is a current issue in our triple-A market where there's a loss in quality, and even games that are essentially copied and pastes like Call Of Duty for example. This is almost exactly the same for Garry's Mod, and playing on these copy and paste servers isn't going to fix this issue. Now what I suggest is to give a gamemode a try, and look at a few servers. Take Star Wars Rp for example, look at a few servers, and then look at which ones are unique from any others that you've joined, and then look at how all the other servers are directly the same. Playing on those unique servers will help aid this major issue in the Garry's Mod development area, and it will start to fix this issue and finally get rid of copy and paste servers.

Now before I pretty much end it there, I included this in the review because I wanted to make a statement, and wanted to keep those who would get this game informed about this games community issues, but do note that this only scratches the surface of its issues, but also its greatness in this game.

TL: DR - If you get this game, please consider trying to play on a unique server, see which ones are the same, and which ones are unique. Do also note that there are many issues about this game, but also many good things about this game.
張貼於 2017 年 12 月 4 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 12.4 小時
As a not really visual novel fan, I say this game is greater then I actually thought. Intresting narrative, great characters, and definitley... fun. I don't want to kepp you here forever so I'm going to write just a short little review listing out pros and cons.

Pros:
- Intresting narrative
- Great concept
- Ending exceeds my expectations

Cons:
- Text is buggy sometimes
- Few bugs the developers may need to fix
- Its very linear to the point that almost everyone will get the same ending when they play for the first time
- Its verASJDFHKJHJSDFHHKSJHJDHJSHDKFJH
張貼於 2017 年 12 月 2 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
< 1  2  3 >
目前顯示第 11-20 項,共 27 項