Star Trek is grounded in our own frame of reference and as such suffers from the limits of our own trite reality. In fact, Star Wars delves more into the world of fantasy and mythology and touches on some universal mythological themes that have been present across humanity since the beginning of time; you'll find that most cultures on Earth share a common mythology. In fact the Greek Odysseus was known as Ulysses in Rome, the Greek Zeus was known as Jupiter in Rome, the Greek Poseidon was known as Neptune in Rome and you're talking about a story of a young farm boy from the middle of nowhere that goes up against a great oppressor - and this story is present in a lot of mythologies such as (sic) Davey and Goliath and you'll find again that this touches a core human emotion that we all need to explore through the fantasy world those concepts we cannot acheive in our own reality world.

Now, on another note, I find that the universal worldwide acceptance of Star Wars is also grounded in this commonality that we all share. Instead of being limited through one frame of reference, the one focal point, we can see things in a cross-cultural manner, if you will. And in fact, to expand on that a little bit, I think that you'll find that the Star Wars Universe is relatable for any culture on Earth; any economic standing, any financial standing on Earth because, again, we are talking about themes that are core to the concept of humanity in general and emotional.

Furthermore, I can tell you that the types of themes that you are talking about in Star Trek are limited to a certain set of circumstances that exist in almost a two-dimensional plane where in Star Wars you're really exploring different feelings about humanity, happiness, sadness; all the various spectrum of the human existence. And I find that even though you're talking about characters that are often not human, we as human beings can identify through their struggles. And you'll find that most great storytelling has to deal with a protagonist, an ordinary person up against extraordinary odds. And I think that if you look at the literature across the history of recorded time, you'll find that a lot of the greatest stories have followed that same theme. The storyline is almost unimportant because you're talking about grand themes here, about human achievement when faced with unlikely odds.

And furthermore, I can tell you that beyond that, it's something that we can all agree upon, it is all something we can all identify with and relatability (I'm sure you know as someone that works in the storytelling world) is a concept that is necessary to have an audience invest themselves in the story that you're telling.

I'll also tell you that the Star Wars universe, while on some level is very exotic, had a musical soundtrack grounded in 19th century Romantic music and, in fact, I can relate Star Wars, the appeal of it, towards some of the great Impressionist paintings like the Dutch van Gogh, because his paintings although not photographic, if you will, or photo realistic inspired our own imagination to latch onto the concepts present in the painting; for example, if you look at van Gogh's Starry Night you'll see that again, while it doesn't necessarily look exactly like a city and stars and the wind blowing through the trees, you can feel the feeling of what it was like to be in that situation. You know, unlike looking at a photograph, which again, gives you that two-dimensional representation, a split-second -microsecond- in time, if we will. And as anyone knows that's had a bad photograph take of them, a split-second in time doesn't often represent the whole picture.

However, when you're talking about the idea of a painting (and certainly an oil painting, an Impressionist oil painting) you're not necessarily capturing all the minute details, you're capturing a feeling. Now, how do you put a feeling down on canvas? How do you put a feeling down on screen? Now that's the job of the artistic storyteller and, in fact, the storyteller in this case took his own human emotions, his own human struggles and that of others and put them into a fantastic circumstance which none of us could have possibly experienced yet can all take pride in, relate to.

Again, the young struggling farm boy wanting to be a part of it all - these are things that were touched upon in 1976's Rocky. I'm talking about the original Rocky. It wasn't about winning the fight. That movie's not a boxing movie. That movie is about an ordinary guy placed in extraordinary circumstances. A guy, he was the underdog, you know, another common concept you find in a lot of literature. He was the underdog that wanted to make good. All he wanted to do was go the distance. He wanted to make it to the Philadelphia Spectrum; it probably has some corporate branded name now, but at the time -1976, shot in 1975- it was called the Philadelphia Spectrum. These theatres and arenas, amphitheatres had real names back then, you know. I think Fenway Park is still named as such, Candlestick Park I'm sure has been renamed. I don't really follow sports myself but I've heard these terms said and I know that a lot of the original, like Shea Stadium is like CitiBank Field or something. But that's not really relelvant to what I'm talking about here, interesting nevertheless.

However, what I'm saying is that for an artist to acurately portray a feeling on film or a canvas or whatever the medium, we could be talking about a mound of clay, really the artistic medium is irrelevant. When a singer gets up and sings, you don't care abut the vocal cords vibrating at certain frequencies, you're trying to take part in and relate to a certain feeling that an artist is trying to convey. When a sculptor takes a look at a hunk of mud and clears away certain sections to make this great monolith of art, again it's not about the minerals that are present in the mud, it's about the feeling that you're trying to convey.