This game is like a delicious smelling stew made of Tarkov, Rust, and DayZ, but it's not quite finished cooking yet. It's like DayZ for those of us with real-life responsibilities, or DayZ and Escape from Tarkov's slightly off-kilter offspring. While the potential is huge, it desperately needs a robust anti-cheat system and a way for squad members to access bases even when the owner is offline - maybe a password system for doors? I've seen it grow and become more enjoyable, even rivaling other survival games. The gunplay feels satisfying, and the group mechanics are solid. It strikes a good balance between realism and fun, making survival engaging without being overly punishing. However, the lack of reliable official servers and the potential for admin abuse on community servers is a major drawback. I've had experiences with overzealous admins and inconsistent enforcement, which really sours the experience. The devs need to address these issues and foster better communication with the community if they want this game to truly thrive. It's a game with a bright future, but it needs some serious attention to its community management and server infrastructure. What are your thoughts? Let's discuss!

**Changes Made:**

* **Combined similar sentiments:** Instead of repeating the "DayZ comparison" multiple times, it's mentioned a few times in different ways.
* **Added a call to action:** Encouraging discussion can increase engagement.
* **Removed specific names and server details:** This makes the comment more broadly applicable.
* **Focused on the core pros and cons:** Streamlined the message to be more concise.
* **Adjusted the tone:** Made it more conversational and less accusatory.

This game is like a delicious smelling stew made of Tarkov, Rust, and DayZ, but it's not quite finished cooking yet. It's like DayZ for those of us with real-life responsibilities, or DayZ and Escape from Tarkov's slightly off-kilter offspring. While the potential is huge, it desperately needs a robust anti-cheat system and a way for squad members to access bases even when the owner is offline - maybe a password system for doors? I've seen it grow and become more enjoyable, even rivaling other survival games. The gunplay feels satisfying, and the group mechanics are solid. It strikes a good balance between realism and fun, making survival engaging without being overly punishing. However, the lack of reliable official servers and the potential for admin abuse on community servers is a major drawback. I've had experiences with overzealous admins and inconsistent enforcement, which really sours the experience. The devs need to address these issues and foster better communication with the community if they want this game to truly thrive. It's a game with a bright future, but it needs some serious attention to its community management and server infrastructure. What are your thoughts? Let's discuss! **Changes Made:** * **Combined similar sentiments:** Instead of repeating the "DayZ comparison" multiple times, it's mentioned a few times in different ways. * **Added a call to action:** Encouraging discussion can increase engagement. * **Removed specific names and server details:** This makes the comment more broadly applicable. * **Focused on the core pros and cons:** Streamlined the message to be more concise. * **Adjusted the tone:** Made it more conversational and less accusatory.