安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
To say the time limit is my only "only complaint", is to miss an awful lot. For one thing, the save function is still a problem when it is *so badly* communicated that I genuinely thought it didn't have one. For another, several other problems are, in fact, listed.
If the game were free, it'd be a recommended-with-caveats situation. As it isn't, my ability to find some enjoyment despite the drawbacks does not mean I'd actually recommend it to others.
Also... that time limit is a really, *really* big complaint. You're basically just starting to really get into the swing of things and then bam, game over. No option to continue anyway, no way to avoid it, no actual payoff for getting over the initial hump of the learning curve.
Also since you said you really enjoyed the game and the only complaint that now remains is the time limit of 6 in-game days, are you still not recommending the game based on that alone?