The gnathion is a little protruding for a female. Which I personally find attractive, along with the spacing of the eyes and the narrow concave celestial nose (in all its squish-in, cartilage-laden, over-extended glory). Aside from that the mandibular angling, the margo supraorbitalis, arcus superciliaris score perfectly in degree of femininity. I have a hard time assessing the angling of the frontal arch, but from the immediate facial elongation I take it to be firmly within a solid female score. Only thing odd about Roses skull is that it is more determinable female than most female skulls.

Further, though not really a characteristic of femininity, the length of alveolar process is quite appealing. Had it been any longer her disposition for jowls would have looked goofy. Had her upper lip not been thin the proportion to said alveolar process would have been skewed, and her face looked squished. The gnathion though masculine adding something. Might be the added appearance of elongation, also contributing to the appearance of orbital spacing. From an aesthetic viewpoint her skull is fairly pleasing. Definitely above Ruth Radelet (which is quite good), though still below Audrey Hepburn (in spite of the grotesque convex nasal arch).

………….……………………. „-/*"\„,„,
…….…………………….¸„-^"¯ :\_ / o '"*'"¯/' WOOF WOOF
……………………¸„„-^"¯ : : : : : : : : ¸„,-~"
**¯¯¯'^^~-„„„----~^*'"¯ : : : : : : : : : :¸-"
.:.:.:.:.„-^" : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :- GIVE THIS CUTE DOG
:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: : : : : : : : : : ¸„-^¯ TO PEOPLE YOU CARE ABOUT
.::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. : : : : : : : ¸„„-^¯
:.' : : '\ : : : : : : : ;¸„„-~"¯
:.:.:: :"-„""***/*'ì¸'¯
:.': : : : :"-„ : : :"\
.:.:.: : : : :" : : : : \,
:.: : : : : : : : : : : : 'Ì
: : : : : : :, : : : : : :/
"-„_::::_„-*__„„~

why am i'm so ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ old

please, save me from the

hai