109
Products
reviewed
2655
Products
in account

Recent reviews by Master Indigo

< 1  2  3  4  5 ... 11 >
Showing 21-30 of 109 entries
208 people found this review helpful
3 people found this review funny
0.7 hrs on record
Should be free. It's funny but lacks contents.

There are 3 different endings, each time the game will take you about 10 minutes to finish. I was trying to take different paths, but they made little to no difference in the end.

Gameplay is basic visual novel, where you read a part, answer some questions which defined how the story continues.

Even for visual novel, this is way too short. One playthought takes about 10 minutes, when you read everything. So you could beat it 100% in less than an hour.

With more content, if it was lenghtier I could recommend it. But the way it is, I can't recommend paying to play it.
Posted 22 March, 2016. Last edited 22 March, 2016.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
48 people found this review helpful
3 people found this review funny
5.2 hrs on record (3.1 hrs at review time)
Early Access Review
Easy to learn, fun WWII flight shooter

Pros:

Fun gameplay even for someone who hasn't played much flying games before! Really action packed
Runs well (I get above 60 fps on a gtx 680)
Full campaign with varied missions. Also Multiplayer!

Dialogue is fully voiced and actors' accents are nice
If you are bad(don't get kill etc), some objectives change to different ones
Nice aesthetics, pretty good graphics
Soundtrack is on point!

Neutral:

It's not really simulation, despite the tags, more like arcade type game!
Multiplayer does not have much players, so play with friends.

Cons:

Rain effects are harsh on your fps at the moment. So some optimization on rain is needed. It's not on every map so that's good :)

KB+Mouse controls can be quite hard, so using some other input could be better, but no needed.

OVERALL:

This could be very well finished game, does not feel like early access. Some polishing on rain effects, and done.
If you like this genre, this is quite good game, just don't expect simulation.
Posted 16 March, 2016. Last edited 16 March, 2016.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
5 people found this review helpful
0.3 hrs on record
Not really a game in basic means, so it is kind of hard to review for me.
It's more of a poet. Really short one. 11 minutes to finish.

The game didn't tell what it was about, I needed to read store page for that. For a good cause, sure. Profits go to charity,
but game itself is not really my cup of tea. Nice idea, but it didn't really help me remember the victims.

In conclusion: Only buy if you are interested in charity, and want something small in return. Game isn't special
Posted 13 March, 2016.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
3 people found this review helpful
0.5 hrs on record
Interesting idea, but needed much more polishing. It's a short story about an alcoholic woman, and the story is really simple, so I won't spoil more.

It could've been alright with some more work, but it isn't really enjoyable as it is. Buggy, and messy unfinished turd.

First person camera with wonky camera will most likely make you feel nauseous. Field of view is also really low.

Took me 22 minutes to finish. There were multiple dialogue choices, don't know if they affect the length, I don't want to play it again. Not worth your time.
Posted 13 March, 2016.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
5 people found this review helpful
4.6 hrs on record
If there was a neutral instead of negative, this would get it.

Where as it isn't bad game, it's mediocre compared to first game. If first game felt like an Half-Life gameplay wise, this feels like Call of Duty. It's also pretty short. Guns don't have much punch in them, and the combat feels boring.

Maybe if I didn't play it back to back with first game, it would've been more enjoyable, but only thing that this game does better is the looks. I was surprised when I launched the game that damn these graphics are quite good compared to first F.E.A.R.

But everything else it lacks.

If you liked first one, and want to complete the story, play this. If not, it's just a mediocre shooter.
Posted 10 March, 2016. Last edited 10 March, 2016.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
4 people found this review helpful
10.0 hrs on record (8.5 hrs at review time)
This review will include the main game, and it's expansions, as they don't have their own store pages.

F.E.A.R.

Gameplay is awesome, guns have lots of weight to them, and you feel like a powerful badass. Gameplay feels kind of mix of Half-Life and something else. Level design is quite similar to first Half-Life game, and It made this even more enjoyable for me. I remembered fear as a horror game with shooter elements, but replaying it now i appreciate it much more. It's damn good shooter. Slo-mo is fun, and useful in hard situations. Game took me 4,5h beat on easy. HLTB says average is over 8 hours, so i guess that difficulty made the game quite a bit shorter.


F.E.A.R.: Extraction Point

Continues the main games story, and picks up straight where the campaign ended. If you graved for more, this will satisfy you quite well. Took me about half the time compared to main game, so good value for an expansion! New guns, new story etc.


FEAR: Perseus Mandate

Second expansion, where you play a different character at the same time the main game took place. You are part of second F.E.A.R. team. This one was more of the same, with even more new weapons. Some new enemies, and new story as well.

Overall, Game and it's expansions are quite damn enjoyable shooters with some horror elements. If you don't like horror, it should not be that big of a problem, the game is shooter, and the storyline is part horror.
Posted 10 March, 2016.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
14 people found this review helpful
0.0 hrs on record
Well, If you get in a pack, sure. Play it, but I wouldn't really pay any extra for it. It took me 30 minutes to beat, with fast playstyle, so it's probably little under an hour with normal style.

You play as one of the clones and lose yout mind and kill your comrades.

It has some interesting level desing, but nothing special. Could've been part of the main campaing with small changes. Didn't really need to be it's own dlc.
Posted 10 March, 2016.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
5 people found this review helpful
1 person found this review funny
75.4 hrs on record
Still active playerbase, even if most players have moved to Counter-Strike: Global Offensive.

I think CS:S custom gun game mods are more enjoyable than CS:GO's official one.

It has most of the stuff that CS:GO has, and is even easier to run. So if you have old PC, and can't run CS:GO, you might be able to run this. If not Original CS it is for you :)
Posted 6 March, 2016.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
5 people found this review helpful
351.5 hrs on record (347.4 hrs at review time)
Class based First Person shooter aka Hat simulator

While I think the player base was more enjoyable when the game was not Free to play, it can be still be enjoyed on good servers.

POSITIVE:

Free to Play
High Amount of Players, and servers.
Classes are different from each other.
You will do better in a game with team play, even if it is not required.
Pretty easy to run even with older computers.
Multiple game modes.
Tons of cosmetic items (Hats)
Frequent updates, and events.

NEGATIVE:

Lots of bad players due to it being free to play.
Starting can be hard, as you do not own all weapons from the beginning.
Mic spam is nothing out the ordinary (Can be muted)
Weapon balance is not always that good.
Posted 6 March, 2016. Last edited 6 March, 2016.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
4 people found this review helpful
1 person found this review funny
143.3 hrs on record (125.8 hrs at review time)
CS:GO Review
Great for competitive gameplay. It gets tense. Fun in more casual modes.

POSITIVES:

Lot's of players. (One of the most played games on PC. )

Matchmaking:

Matchmaking games are intense, and you play like you want to win.
Wanting to rank up has a nice feeling to it.
Lot's of different ranks.
Team play is required, and you will be much likely to win if you use VoIP.

Casual:

Community servers offer many different gamemodes. (Such as surfing.)
Tons of servers.
Custom maps.

NEGATIVES:

Matchmaking:
If you are in EU, there is high change for Russians in your MM team, and many of them do not speak english.
Sometimes finding a match takes really long.
Mic spamming is present sometimes( Can be muted)
"Smurf" account, higher ranking players on lower rank accounts make the matches unbalanced, and it is not that unusual.
There are cheaters, sometimes they play for a long time unnoticed.
Pool of maps in MM is pretty small. (Different maps come as Operations, which are paid and limited time)

Casual:
Can be pretty toxic
Mic spamming is usual ( Can be muted)
Posted 6 March, 2016.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
< 1  2  3  4  5 ... 11 >
Showing 21-30 of 109 entries