Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
This will almost certainly result in some kind of action being taken, although we can't even reliably guess when that might be or what form it will take.
Genuine curators, like Indiegems (sorry shameless plug), appreciate it when these charlatans get unearthed because curators get such a bad rep these days, and it's all down to underhanded practices like these.
Don't lose hope though. There are still a lot of genuine curators out there with honest reviews which are done through the fun of playing. I wish VALVE would have a clampdown though as it's getting to the point where developers and readers don't trust curators.
I know there's a lot of shady stuff that happens in the underbelly of Steam, but we must be careful to give the benefit of the doubt where we can.
Or as they say, don't assume maliciousness when incompetence is a viable explanation.