安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
But honestly if I ever make Civ mods, I would want the Civs to have a very Unquie playstyle
I think the most recent change is out of a misunderstanding. There was an exploit involving the ability and flipping free cities, but removing the functionality entirely when taking cities is a bad fix. It seems to be nearly universally unpopular as a change, so that's why I suspect it'll be reverted in the next major patch (with a fix for the exploit).
- You can't stack Great Generals/Admirals any more.
- Mercantilism is no longer so easy to beeline, indirectly nerfing Sea Dogs.
- Trade routes now spread religious pressure, so England is no longer a joke option for religious games. I'd still favour domination or culture though.
- The Angkor Wat wonder (requires the new DLC) makes developing your colonial empire much easier thanks to its empire-wide boost to population and housing.
http://steamproxy.net/profiles/76561197999879843/screenshots/
http://steamproxy.net/profiles/76561197999879843/screenshots/
As you can see these two artefacts are from different eras and the same civ, yet the museum shows as themed, despite being a regular museum. Is this a glitch? English museums are weird :|