Asenna Steam
kirjaudu sisään
|
kieli
简体中文 (yksinkertaistettu kiina)
繁體中文 (perinteinen kiina)
日本語 (japani)
한국어 (korea)
ไทย (thai)
български (bulgaria)
Čeština (tšekki)
Dansk (tanska)
Deutsch (saksa)
English (englanti)
Español – España (espanja – Espanja)
Español – Latinoamérica (espanja – Lat. Am.)
Ελληνικά (kreikka)
Français (ranska)
Italiano (italia)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesia)
Magyar (unkari)
Nederlands (hollanti)
Norsk (norja)
Polski (puola)
Português (portugali – Portugali)
Português – Brasil (portugali – Brasilia)
Română (romania)
Русский (venäjä)
Svenska (ruotsi)
Türkçe (turkki)
Tiếng Việt (vietnam)
Українська (ukraina)
Ilmoita käännösongelmasta
But honestly if I ever make Civ mods, I would want the Civs to have a very Unquie playstyle
I think the most recent change is out of a misunderstanding. There was an exploit involving the ability and flipping free cities, but removing the functionality entirely when taking cities is a bad fix. It seems to be nearly universally unpopular as a change, so that's why I suspect it'll be reverted in the next major patch (with a fix for the exploit).
- You can't stack Great Generals/Admirals any more.
- Mercantilism is no longer so easy to beeline, indirectly nerfing Sea Dogs.
- Trade routes now spread religious pressure, so England is no longer a joke option for religious games. I'd still favour domination or culture though.
- The Angkor Wat wonder (requires the new DLC) makes developing your colonial empire much easier thanks to its empire-wide boost to population and housing.
http://steamproxy.net/profiles/76561197999879843/screenshots/
http://steamproxy.net/profiles/76561197999879843/screenshots/
As you can see these two artefacts are from different eras and the same civ, yet the museum shows as themed, despite being a regular museum. Is this a glitch? English museums are weird :|