安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Grombindal>Thorgrim since you can spam the ancestor powers.
but rune smith can give you a lot weath by his aoe buffs and damaging spell(also he is not a bad fighter)
sorry for my english, if you see mistakes
Please don't feed the troll. They thrive on any sort of attention, and don't even mean what they say.
@ Bloodlust
While a good idea, The one issue I have with re sacking the same settlement over and over is that while I'm racking up experience and loot, the enemy is growing stronger with every turn. I feel that a quick "smash and grab" at the beginning of a campaign is crucial; When you do turtle down, every settlement you took from them strengthens you and weakens them several dozen times over.
Also, a place in the Empire's campaign where the "repeated sacking" works brilliantly is Grung Zint near Marienburg. The repeated raids on the Skullsmasherz is not only a reliable source of cash, Loot, and XP, but it the Britonians will LOVE you for it.