安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
You're saying that fixed artillery has only defensive capabilities, AND fixed artillery encourages camping. You also say defense and camping are not the same either. Logically speaking, these two sentences you created make no sense. It is pretty much saying: A implies B (B and C cannot be the same). A also implies C.
This pretty much tells me that you did not put too much thought into why there should not be fixed artillery other than ' I dislike "camping" and I think it is camping, therefore; don't do it '. The rules you like to enforce (mainly this one in question) just seem as though you are purposefully taking the fun out of the game because you want it your way. As though the people who support profiling/generalizing are somehow righteous.