Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
You're saying that fixed artillery has only defensive capabilities, AND fixed artillery encourages camping. You also say defense and camping are not the same either. Logically speaking, these two sentences you created make no sense. It is pretty much saying: A implies B (B and C cannot be the same). A also implies C.
This pretty much tells me that you did not put too much thought into why there should not be fixed artillery other than ' I dislike "camping" and I think it is camping, therefore; don't do it '. The rules you like to enforce (mainly this one in question) just seem as though you are purposefully taking the fun out of the game because you want it your way. As though the people who support profiling/generalizing are somehow righteous.