ストアページ
Cities: Skylines
すべて スレッド スクリーンショット 作品 ブロードキャスト 動画 ワークショップ ニュース ガイド レビュー

Cities: Skylines

ストアページ
Cities: Skylines >  ワークショップ > outreamerのワークショップ
114 人が評価
Forsmark reactor nr: 3
説明 スレッド0 コメント7 変更履歴
   
アワード
お気に入り
お気に入り
お気に入りから削除
Assets: Building, Electricity
ファイルサイズ
投稿日
11.000 MB
2015年12月19日 16時17分
1 項目の変更履歴 ( 表示 )
作成者
outreamer
オフライン
1193 件のコレクションを全て見る（全てが公開されているわけではありません）
12,997 ユニーク訪問者数
5,891 現在の登録者数
362 現在のお気に入り数

サブスクライブしてダウンロード
Forsmark reactor nr: 3

解説
Forsmark3.1 by ehrlund:

This is the last nuclear power reactor of a total of three, representing Forsmarks all reactors in Sweden.

(The 3.1 is just because of a minor tweak.)

Because CS keeps crashing when I try to open the model in the asset editor to find out the data, this is this the only info about the building I got at the moment:

Plot Sizes: Reactor 1 & 2: 12x13 Reactor 3: 8x16 I think, gotta check this one up to...


Up Keep: 300 / week
Power Out put: 900 MW

This being the latest and most efficient reactor of the three.

I think reactor 1 and 2 have basically the same specks as the in game Power Plant. You should obviously build them in the correct order as well. Reactor 1, Reactor 2 and last Reactor 3 :)

Reactor: 1
http://steamproxy.net/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=579355760
Reactor: 2
http://steamproxy.net/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=579350450
7 件のコメント
< >
YOYO 2022年9月14日 2時12分 
The asset is beautiful, but why can't the fence be removed? Because of the fence, it is difficult to make the overall shape and layout. Too many fence makes the power plant ugly. Hope the author updates the asset so that the fence can be removed.
simson 2020年7月14日 1時39分 
I was looking for a Barsebäck for a nice Øresund area but this is a good substitute.
Phillipzu 2019年7月19日 8時51分 
Fits well in the Soviet NPP collection:
https://steamproxy.net/workshop/filedetails/?id=1808642059
Keep up the good work! :D
norlin.martin 2016年7月4日 15時18分 
I uesd to live near that thing. Thanks!
Casgar 2015年12月24日 10時55分 
Just some suggestions, I think you should increase the weekly cost by quite abit. 300-500/week sound way too low imo. A x20 increase in the weekly cost would still be relatively cheep cost per MW.

Regarding the power output, have you chosen the numbers based on anything special? The actual outputs from the real reactors varies somewhere around 1000-1200 MW each, with Reactor 1 being the "smallest" as of right now.
Captain-No 2015年12月19日 17時54分 
fit well in the -Scandinavian- all in one Collection:
http://steamproxy.net/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=513137131
thank you, Thumbs up
Blackdragonbird 2015年12月19日 17時09分 
Can you please give more data? Each piece power output, water consumption, upkeep, build costs, plot size. And them the stats of the whole strutucture put togheter.

You can also create a collection with the 3 pieces to make easy to subscribe to all of them at once.

=)