安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題









On the other hand, diplomatic Civs tend to be good against scientific Civs as World Leader votes can begin as soon as anyone enters the information era, and a technological advantage in the late-game gives very little advantage to winning over City-States.
You can also try taking over the Civ's allied City-States. Be sure to start a war with the allied Civ rather than the City-State itself; declaring war directly on too many City-States gives you a penalty to influence gain.
I had this issue in one of my recent games, where I was technologically more advanced than others, and aiming for a Science Victory, but was left helpless to do anything to prevent a Diplomatic Victory by the AI, having allied itself with all CSs. It's way too expensive to bribe CSs enough to overcome an alliance that is in the upper 100s or 200s; and the quests are mostly about luck, and the relationship deteriorates too quickly. It's really such a challenge, especially at higher difficulties.
Cavalry and Tanks make less risky spotters - just move in so the city's in sight, hit it with your siege weapons and move out again.