Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고









On the other hand, diplomatic Civs tend to be good against scientific Civs as World Leader votes can begin as soon as anyone enters the information era, and a technological advantage in the late-game gives very little advantage to winning over City-States.
You can also try taking over the Civ's allied City-States. Be sure to start a war with the allied Civ rather than the City-State itself; declaring war directly on too many City-States gives you a penalty to influence gain.
I had this issue in one of my recent games, where I was technologically more advanced than others, and aiming for a Science Victory, but was left helpless to do anything to prevent a Diplomatic Victory by the AI, having allied itself with all CSs. It's way too expensive to bribe CSs enough to overcome an alliance that is in the upper 100s or 200s; and the quests are mostly about luck, and the relationship deteriorates too quickly. It's really such a challenge, especially at higher difficulties.
Cavalry and Tanks make less risky spotters - just move in so the city's in sight, hit it with your siege weapons and move out again.