Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告









On the other hand, diplomatic Civs tend to be good against scientific Civs as World Leader votes can begin as soon as anyone enters the information era, and a technological advantage in the late-game gives very little advantage to winning over City-States.
You can also try taking over the Civ's allied City-States. Be sure to start a war with the allied Civ rather than the City-State itself; declaring war directly on too many City-States gives you a penalty to influence gain.
I had this issue in one of my recent games, where I was technologically more advanced than others, and aiming for a Science Victory, but was left helpless to do anything to prevent a Diplomatic Victory by the AI, having allied itself with all CSs. It's way too expensive to bribe CSs enough to overcome an alliance that is in the upper 100s or 200s; and the quests are mostly about luck, and the relationship deteriorates too quickly. It's really such a challenge, especially at higher difficulties.
Cavalry and Tanks make less risky spotters - just move in so the city's in sight, hit it with your siege weapons and move out again.