Cài đặt Steam
Đăng nhập
|
Ngôn ngữ
简体中文 (Trung giản thể)
繁體中文 (Trung phồn thể)
日本語 (Nhật)
한국어 (Hàn Quốc)
ไทย (Thái)
Български (Bulgaria)
Čeština (CH Séc)
Dansk (Đan Mạch)
Deutsch (Đức)
English (Anh)
Español - España (Tây Ban Nha - TBN)
Español - Latinoamérica (Tây Ban Nha cho Mỹ Latin)
Ελληνικά (Hy Lạp)
Français (Pháp)
Italiano (Ý)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesia)
Magyar (Hungary)
Nederlands (Hà Lan)
Norsk (Na Uy)
Polski (Ba Lan)
Português (Tiếng Bồ Đào Nha - BĐN)
Português - Brasil (Bồ Đào Nha - Brazil)
Română (Rumani)
Русский (Nga)
Suomi (Phần Lan)
Svenska (Thụy Điển)
Türkçe (Thổ Nhĩ Kỳ)
Українська (Ukraina)
Báo cáo lỗi dịch thuật









Nonetheless, building to 20 cities is usually excessive (unless some of those are captured, or you're playing a huge map with a low number of starting Civs.) Some AI Civs in particular (the Iroquois springs to mind, but they're not the only ones) really like spamming cities even when they're in terrible locations. Because the AI get bonuses to happiness above Prince difficulty, they can spam cities much more easily than human players can.
Might I ask what your steam level is?
It has got to be huge man!
We can't see it because your profile is private... but you don't care if we know that right?
And if I might say something... I hope its not the case, because 20-25 cities is retarded... I had 3 for most of the game and 4 near the end for Aluminum (I was the Inca building tall).
But here is my point:
I usually only build 5 cities, even when building wide...
And the reason I am writing this is because I want to ask if I am completely wrong in my perception of building wide. Is 20 cities normal? How many (generally) should I build when building wide? (I know that there is no such thing as a rigid number but please give me YOUR personal preference.)
Thank you,
Garrison
Just to warn people in advance, it may be quite a while until the next guide, and there's a good chance it'll be more based on the need for a guide than the number of requests.