安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









Nonetheless, building to 20 cities is usually excessive (unless some of those are captured, or you're playing a huge map with a low number of starting Civs.) Some AI Civs in particular (the Iroquois springs to mind, but they're not the only ones) really like spamming cities even when they're in terrible locations. Because the AI get bonuses to happiness above Prince difficulty, they can spam cities much more easily than human players can.
Might I ask what your steam level is?
It has got to be huge man!
We can't see it because your profile is private... but you don't care if we know that right?
And if I might say something... I hope its not the case, because 20-25 cities is retarded... I had 3 for most of the game and 4 near the end for Aluminum (I was the Inca building tall).
But here is my point:
I usually only build 5 cities, even when building wide...
And the reason I am writing this is because I want to ask if I am completely wrong in my perception of building wide. Is 20 cities normal? How many (generally) should I build when building wide? (I know that there is no such thing as a rigid number but please give me YOUR personal preference.)
Thank you,
Garrison
Just to warn people in advance, it may be quite a while until the next guide, and there's a good chance it'll be more based on the need for a guide than the number of requests.