Cài đặt Steam
Đăng nhập
|
Ngôn ngữ
简体中文 (Trung giản thể)
繁體中文 (Trung phồn thể)
日本語 (Nhật)
한국어 (Hàn Quốc)
ไทย (Thái)
Български (Bulgaria)
Čeština (CH Séc)
Dansk (Đan Mạch)
Deutsch (Đức)
English (Anh)
Español - España (Tây Ban Nha - TBN)
Español - Latinoamérica (Tây Ban Nha cho Mỹ Latin)
Ελληνικά (Hy Lạp)
Français (Pháp)
Italiano (Ý)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesia)
Magyar (Hungary)
Nederlands (Hà Lan)
Norsk (Na Uy)
Polski (Ba Lan)
Português (Tiếng Bồ Đào Nha - BĐN)
Português - Brasil (Bồ Đào Nha - Brazil)
Română (Rumani)
Русский (Nga)
Suomi (Phần Lan)
Svenska (Thụy Điển)
Türkçe (Thổ Nhĩ Kỳ)
Українська (Ukraina)
Báo cáo lỗi dịch thuật









From my experience, Khan's and Hakkapeliitta's traits clash: when a Khan and Hakkapeliitta start a turn stacked onto each other, the Khan's movement rate (5) is in fact *reduced* to that of the Hakkapeliitta (4) ! The Khan does regain his normal movement if the Hakkapeliitta moves out of the tile first however. Still, this means that there is no real positive synergy between the UUs
I have to say however that I discovered this playing as Venice, when *both* units were gifted to me by city-states, so I can't really rule out that this only happens in that specific case.
Most propably the rest of your guide is just as awesome as the beginnig - great work, thumbs up.
Here are some reasons for conquering City-States. There may seem like quite a few, but many of them are rather situational."
Got a duplicate, there.