Steam'i Yükleyin
giriş
|
dil
简体中文 (Basitleştirilmiş Çince)
繁體中文 (Geleneksel Çince)
日本語 (Japonca)
한국어 (Korece)
ไทย (Tayca)
Български (Bulgarca)
Čeština (Çekçe)
Dansk (Danca)
Deutsch (Almanca)
English (İngilizce)
Español - España (İspanyolca - İspanya)
Español - Latinoamérica (İspanyolca - Latin Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Yunanca)
Français (Fransızca)
Italiano (İtalyanca)
Bahasa Indonesia (Endonezce)
Magyar (Macarca)
Nederlands (Hollandaca)
Norsk (Norveççe)
Polski (Lehçe)
Português (Portekizce - Portekiz)
Português - Brasil (Portekizce - Brezilya)
Română (Rumence)
Русский (Rusça)
Suomi (Fince)
Svenska (İsveççe)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamca)
Українська (Ukraynaca)
Bir çeviri sorunu bildirin









From my experience, Khan's and Hakkapeliitta's traits clash: when a Khan and Hakkapeliitta start a turn stacked onto each other, the Khan's movement rate (5) is in fact *reduced* to that of the Hakkapeliitta (4) ! The Khan does regain his normal movement if the Hakkapeliitta moves out of the tile first however. Still, this means that there is no real positive synergy between the UUs
I have to say however that I discovered this playing as Venice, when *both* units were gifted to me by city-states, so I can't really rule out that this only happens in that specific case.
Most propably the rest of your guide is just as awesome as the beginnig - great work, thumbs up.
Here are some reasons for conquering City-States. There may seem like quite a few, but many of them are rather situational."
Got a duplicate, there.