安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









From my experience, Khan's and Hakkapeliitta's traits clash: when a Khan and Hakkapeliitta start a turn stacked onto each other, the Khan's movement rate (5) is in fact *reduced* to that of the Hakkapeliitta (4) ! The Khan does regain his normal movement if the Hakkapeliitta moves out of the tile first however. Still, this means that there is no real positive synergy between the UUs
I have to say however that I discovered this playing as Venice, when *both* units were gifted to me by city-states, so I can't really rule out that this only happens in that specific case.
Most propably the rest of your guide is just as awesome as the beginnig - great work, thumbs up.
Here are some reasons for conquering City-States. There may seem like quite a few, but many of them are rather situational."
Got a duplicate, there.