安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









This is why people are prune to making the UA their main strategy and forgo the other two uniques, Besides building Stables for the gold, Poland's UA is one of the strongest in the game. The UA is so good that you can survive easily without your other two uniques. While you are not using Poland to its fullest potential with all of its uniques combined, you are using it for another good purpose to suit your needs. Hence making Poland the greatest All-Rounder Civ in the game. Go for what you wish to do, you might not be the greatest at it, but that is the cost of the best flexibility in the game.
Use this guide if you want to follow the Way poland is best at, only use tidbits of it otherwise.
Sure you won't be as good at Scientific victories as Korea or Babylon, but the sheer amount of policies means you can switch for a back up option if you're losing out on the science race. Same with Cultural, Egypt or France doing better? Then switch to science or diplomacy to even the odds.
I m assuming it's probably from some up date made after you created the guide ~~
A general rule is that if a civ has a bonus tied to a specific type of terrain, they'll probably have a start bias associated with it.