Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
This is why people are prune to making the UA their main strategy and forgo the other two uniques, Besides building Stables for the gold, Poland's UA is one of the strongest in the game. The UA is so good that you can survive easily without your other two uniques. While you are not using Poland to its fullest potential with all of its uniques combined, you are using it for another good purpose to suit your needs. Hence making Poland the greatest All-Rounder Civ in the game. Go for what you wish to do, you might not be the greatest at it, but that is the cost of the best flexibility in the game.
Use this guide if you want to follow the Way poland is best at, only use tidbits of it otherwise.
Sure you won't be as good at Scientific victories as Korea or Babylon, but the sheer amount of policies means you can switch for a back up option if you're losing out on the science race. Same with Cultural, Egypt or France doing better? Then switch to science or diplomacy to even the odds.
I m assuming it's probably from some up date made after you created the guide ~~
A general rule is that if a civ has a bonus tied to a specific type of terrain, they'll probably have a start bias associated with it.