Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
This is why people are prune to making the UA their main strategy and forgo the other two uniques, Besides building Stables for the gold, Poland's UA is one of the strongest in the game. The UA is so good that you can survive easily without your other two uniques. While you are not using Poland to its fullest potential with all of its uniques combined, you are using it for another good purpose to suit your needs. Hence making Poland the greatest All-Rounder Civ in the game. Go for what you wish to do, you might not be the greatest at it, but that is the cost of the best flexibility in the game.
Use this guide if you want to follow the Way poland is best at, only use tidbits of it otherwise.
Sure you won't be as good at Scientific victories as Korea or Babylon, but the sheer amount of policies means you can switch for a back up option if you're losing out on the science race. Same with Cultural, Egypt or France doing better? Then switch to science or diplomacy to even the odds.
I m assuming it's probably from some up date made after you created the guide ~~
A general rule is that if a civ has a bonus tied to a specific type of terrain, they'll probably have a start bias associated with it.