Инсталирайте Steam
вход
|
език
Опростен китайски (简体中文)
Традиционен китайски (繁體中文)
Японски (日本語)
Корейски (한국어)
Тайландски (ไทย)
Чешки (Čeština)
Датски (Dansk)
Немски (Deutsch)
Английски (English)
Испански — Испания (Español — España)
Испански — Латинска Америка (Español — Latinoamérica)
Гръцки (Ελληνικά)
Френски (Français)
Италиански (Italiano)
Индонезийски (Bahasa Indonesia)
Унгарски (Magyar)
Холандски (Nederlands)
Норвежки (Norsk)
Полски (Polski)
Португалски (Português)
Бразилски португалски (Português — Brasil)
Румънски (Română)
Руски (Русский)
Финландски (Suomi)
Шведски (Svenska)
Турски (Türkçe)
Виетнамски (Tiếng Việt)
Украински (Українська)
Докладване на проблем с превода









This is why people are prune to making the UA their main strategy and forgo the other two uniques, Besides building Stables for the gold, Poland's UA is one of the strongest in the game. The UA is so good that you can survive easily without your other two uniques. While you are not using Poland to its fullest potential with all of its uniques combined, you are using it for another good purpose to suit your needs. Hence making Poland the greatest All-Rounder Civ in the game. Go for what you wish to do, you might not be the greatest at it, but that is the cost of the best flexibility in the game.
Use this guide if you want to follow the Way poland is best at, only use tidbits of it otherwise.
Sure you won't be as good at Scientific victories as Korea or Babylon, but the sheer amount of policies means you can switch for a back up option if you're losing out on the science race. Same with Cultural, Egypt or France doing better? Then switch to science or diplomacy to even the odds.
I m assuming it's probably from some up date made after you created the guide ~~
A general rule is that if a civ has a bonus tied to a specific type of terrain, they'll probably have a start bias associated with it.