Installa Steam
Accedi
|
Lingua
简体中文 (cinese semplificato)
繁體中文 (cinese tradizionale)
日本語 (giapponese)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandese)
Български (bulgaro)
Čeština (ceco)
Dansk (danese)
Deutsch (tedesco)
English (inglese)
Español - España (spagnolo - Spagna)
Español - Latinoamérica (spagnolo dell'America Latina)
Ελληνικά (greco)
Français (francese)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesiano)
Magyar (ungherese)
Nederlands (olandese)
Norsk (norvegese)
Polski (polacco)
Português (portoghese - Portogallo)
Português - Brasil (portoghese brasiliano)
Română (rumeno)
Русский (russo)
Suomi (finlandese)
Svenska (svedese)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraino)
Segnala un problema nella traduzione












It can barely despawn enough water to keep up with 2 water drain pipes.
Wouldn't it make more sense for both points to be spawners, so sewage gets pushed away into the sea like most maps?
I ask because I see on some other maps you use the logic of give people a lake with a spawner for fresh water, and then they can dump sewage into river or sea to be carried away, so this doesn't look like your design philosophy, unless you intended players to switch to water treatment after that 1 water despawner is at capacity?
Have fun!
You might not have tuna on this map, but getting tuna is really hard. The current flow required is crazy and difficult to get at the significant depth required.